Friday, 3 March 2017

Ex-journalist arrested over US Jewish centre threats

A former journalist has been arrested on suspicion of making threats against Jewish community centres - in a bizarre plot against an ex-girlfriend.
Juan Thompson, 31, "allegedly caused havoc, expending hundreds of hours of police and law enforcement resources", said NYPD Commissioner James P O'Neill.
New York prosecutors said he was "stalking a former romantic interest".
The Missouri man was allegedly behind eight of some 100 threats to Jewish Community Centers (JCC) this year.

TwitterImage copyrightTWITTER
Image captionThompson's Twitter account made many references to the bomb threats

Mr Thompson was arrested on Friday in St Louis, Missouri, and will be in court later in the day.
As well as the threats against the JCCs in January and February, he is also accused of emailing a threat in his ex-girlfriend's name to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in New York City.
The next day the offices of the Jewish anti-bigotry group received a phone call claiming that explosive material had been placed inside the building.
"Today, we have charged Juan Thompson with allegedly stalking a former romantic interest by, among other things, making bomb threats in her name to Jewish Community Centers and to the Anti-Defamation League," New York-based US Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement.
A spokesman for the White House said "it's still too early for us to say too much about it, but the process worked".

Authorities respond to a threat in Davie, FloridaImage copyrightAP
Image captionAuthorities respond to a threat in Davie, Florida

Mr Thompson is accused of cyber-stalking his ex-girlfriend - known in court documents as Victim-1 - which can carry a sentence of up to five years in jail.
He is also alleged to have made threats using his own real name, in a ploy to make it look like she was trying to frame him.
On 7 February, he allegedly wrote an email to the JCC offices in Manhattan, saying: "Juan Thompson put two bombs in the office of the Jewish center today.
"He wants to create Jewish newtown tomorrow."

Hoax bomb threats have triggered evacuations, causing mass disruption at JCCsImage copyrightAP
Image captionHoax bomb threats have triggered evacuations, causing mass disruption at JCCs

This was a reference to the 2012 school shooting in Connecticut in which a gunman murdered 26 people.
In several tweets presented by investigators, Mr Thompson repeatedly accused his former girlfriend of making bomb threats in his name, in order to pin the crime on him.
He claimed she had hacked his email account.
"[Victim-1], though I can't prove it, even sent a bomb threat in my name to a Jewish center, which was odd given her antisemitic statement," he posted on 24 February 2017.
He also made several posts condemning the anti-Jewish threats.

TweetImage copyrightTWITTER

It was allegedly part of a months-long campaign against his former partner after they broke up in July 2016.
Thompson began by sending an email to her manager at a New York-area social service organisation.
The message claimed she had been pulled over for drunk driving and sued for spreading a sexually transmitted disease.
He allegedly went on to threaten to publish nude photos of the woman, before escalating to the bomb threats this year.
On 24 February, he posted on Twitter: "Y'all know how to get a social worker in NY barred? I'm being stalked and harassed by a white nasty white woman."

A Stand Against Hate rally was held on Thursday in PhiladelphiaImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionA Stand Against Hate rally was held on Thursday in Philadelphia
a sign against hateImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image captionThe rally was organised after a local Jewish cemetery was vandalised

Mr Thompson was fired last year from the Intercept, a news website, over "fabricated sources and quotes in his articles".
Intercept management released a statement on Friday saying they were "horrified" to learn about the arrest, and that they condemn the "heinous" threats.
At least 100 phone threats have been made to Jewish centres, childcare facilities and schools in three dozen states since the beginning of January, according to the JCC Association of North America.
Three Jewish cemeteries, including one near St Louis, have also faced vandalism attacks.

Ravi Bopara happy to play in Pakistan if Karachi Kings reach PSL final

Bopara's Karachi Kings side take on Peshawar Zalmi in the second semi-final in Dubai and, if successful, the 31-year-old Essex player will be making a journey the likes of Kevin Pietersen, Tymal Mills and Luke Wright have already deemed unsafe.
Pakistan has not hosted major international cricket since the Sri Lankan team bus was involved in a terrorist attack in 2009, an incident which took place close to Lahore's Gaddafi Stadium and claimed the lives of six policemen and two civilians.
The Professional Cricketers' Association and FICA, the international equivalent, have advised against taking part in a Lahore-based finale but Bopara tweeted: "If we win tonight I will travel to Lahore for the final."
The group stages and knockout matches of the PSL Twenty20 competition have been held in Pakistan's adopted home of the United Arab Emirates but the showpiece is due to take place at the Gaddafi.
Overseas players were given the option not to play in Lahore, where there have been at least two further deadly attacks this year, though financial incentives also existed by way of additional appearance bonuses.
The English trio of Pietersen, Wright and Mills quickly announced they would not attend once their Quetta Gladiators side qualified, while fellow foreign imports Brendon McCullum and Rilee Rossouw have pulled out too.
International commentators Danny Morrison, Mel Jones and Alan Wilkins are also reported to have made themselves unavailable and Sunset&Vine, the television production house responsible for delivering the rest of the tournament, are not involved with the final

Kim Jong-nam death: Malaysia releases North Korean detainee

The only North Korean held in Malaysia in connection with the death of Kim Jong-nam has been released by police.
Officials have said there is insufficient evidence to charge Ri Jong Chol, and that he will be deported over immigration offences.
Meanwhile an arrest warrant has been issued for a North Korean airline employee accused of the murder.
Malaysia has condemned the use of the powerful VX nerve agent in the 13 February attack.
Mr Kim, the estranged half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, died at an airport in the Malaysian capital, Kuala Lumpur.
Two women were charged on Thursday with killing him by smearing his face with VX, a banned chemical weapon.
Doan Thi Huong from Vietnam and Siti Aisyah from Indonesia have said they thought they were taking part in a TV prank. They have yet to make a formal plea in their case.
Suspect Ri Jong Chol has been handed over to immigration officials for deportation because he has no travel documents, but it is not clear when this will happen.
Malaysian police chief Khalid Abu Bakar denied that any political or diplomatic pressure had been applied in the case and said the North Korean had been released because of lack of evidence, AFP reported.
Ri Jong Chol had lived in Malaysia for three years but, according to Reuters news agency, his work permit expired on 6 February 2017.
Malaysia is seeking seven other North Korean suspects, including an embassy official.
Police said on Friday that an arrest warrant had been issued for 37-year-old Kim Uk-il, who works for North Korean national airline Air Koryo. He is believed to be still in Malaysia.
Reuters news agency reported that security checks on North Koreans had been stepped up at all border crossings to prevent them from leaving.
On Thursday, Malaysia announced it was cancelling visa-free travel for visiting North Koreans, citing security reasons.
Media captionWhy was North Korea's Kim Jong-nam killed?
It has not directly blamed North Korea for the attack, but there is widespread suspicion Pyongyang was responsible.
North Korea has strongly rejected the allegations. It also rejected the findings of the post-mortem examination, having objected to it being carried out at all, and has demanded the body be handed over to them.
It has not yet confirmed that the body is that of Kim Jong-nam, acknowledging him only as a North Korean citizen. Mr Kim was travelling using a passport under a different name.

Misbah to decide on Test future 'soon'

The Pakistan Super League (PSL) has come and gone - for Misbah-ul-Haq at least - but no decision has emerged on the Pakistan Test captain's future in the game, or at least a decision he is willing to share publicly.
On Wednesday night in Sharjah, after the defending champions Islamabad United were knocked out by Karachi Kings, Misbah said he was planning to meet the board chairman Shaharyar Khan upon his return to Pakistan to let him know about his future plans.
Questions about his future have become a permanent feature at Misbah's press events these days, though they have increased since the Test series defeat in Australia. He was even asked about it by Ramiz Raja in Sharjah at the post-match ceremony following his side's exit.
He has been resolutely non-committal in his responses: before the PSL, he told ESPNcricinfo he would take a call after seeing how he fares in the tournament; during it, he told ESPNcricinfo he was likely to go on Pakistan's next assignment, a tour of the Caribbean, where they are yet to win a Test series.
After Islamabad's defeat, he chuckled when the first question on the subject came up. He was asked about comments he had made in which he suggested he could go to the Caribbean as a player and not as captain.
"I don't understand what you want to hear from me," he said. "I was asked whether I would go as a player or as a captain and this decision is for the cricket board. I have to decide whether I want to play or not, but, obviously, the final authority is always the cricket board on who will or won't be captain."
Part of what will no doubt form any decision is his form. He began the PSL well, with an unbeaten 61 against Lahore in Dubai, but has since trailed off with a series of low scores with low strike rates.
On Wednesday, he was bowled by an Imad Wasim delivery that skidded through his defence. And he admitted afterwards that his lack of runs had "made a difference" to Islamabad's campaign. "It is important to perform in such pressure situations. When, as a senior player you don't contribute, you have pressure on you, on the team."
The words more or less echo those he had been saying while on duty for Pakistan over the last few months: he averaged 15 in four Tests across New Zealand and Australia, and just over 26 if you include the three Tests against West Indies in the UAE just before that.
Given his mode of operation, it is unlikely Shaharyar will make the first move. He has left it to Misbah to inform him of the decision. "I want to decide soon," Misbah said. "I am very happy that the chairman has given me this honour that he has left it to me to decide. I am honoured by that. Obviously, I will tell him sooner rather than later because there's not much time now [to the West Indies tour].
"I will now go to Pakistan and speak to the chairman and tell him whatever my final decision is."

Eden Park redux for series decider

The Big Picture
Neither side has wanted to grasp hold of this series. There has been some impressive cricket from both, headlined by Martin Guptill in Hamilton and AB de Villiers throughout, but also vulnerabilities exposed - perhaps more than expected in the case of South Africa who arrived as the No. 1 side. It has made for compelling viewing.
New Zealand have made it their thing this season to dethrone the top one-day side. Firstly they did it to Australia and now they have done it to South Africa (at least briefly). Whatever the outcome at Eden Park it is unlikely to change each sides' thinking too much in terms of the Champions Trophy, but South Africa have a few unwanted concerns over the middle order while New Zealand remain in a muddle over the wicketkeeping position which has a knock-on impact to the middle order.
Talk of momentum heading into the decider would appear pointless given how New Zealand responded to being bowled out for 112 in Wellington. South Africa need to find a similar reply after being Guptill-ed. If they don't, de Villiers will leave Eden Park with that sinking feeling again.
Form guide

(completed matches, most recent first)
New Zealand WLWLW
South Africa LWLWW
In the spotlight
Tim Southee has had an interesting series. He has bowled some superb deliveries, and his four-over spell of cutters in Hamilton helped throttle the South Africa middle order, but overall he has gone for 6.59. Although it needs to be qualified that he bowled to de Villiers at the death and, crucially, got his yorkers in to seal the Christchurch victory. He returns to the ground where he (just about) held his nerve against Marcus Stoinis' onslaught earlier this season.
AB de Villiers has barely put a foot wrong with the bat - although some help from his middle order would not go amiss - but he now needs to steel himself and his team for a crunch encounter. Was it fate that there would be a deciding match at Eden Park? Before the T20I, he had noticed now much that semi-final was replayed on TV. This is another excuse for the sports channels in New Zealand to re-run the match again.
Team news
New Zealand have added Matt Henry to the squad on duty in Hamilton. It is unlikely they will play two frontline spinners at this ground although Jeetan Patel's offspin added a new dimension to the attack. Henry bowled well in the recent Plunket Shield match, even if it wasn't enough to keep him in the Test squad, while Lockie Ferguson was expensive in the Wellington ODI.
New Zealand (probable) 1 Martin Guptill, Dean Brownlie, 3 Kane Williamson (capt), 4 Ross Taylor, 5 James Neesham, 6 Luke Ronchi (wk), 7 Colin de Grandhomme, 8 Mitchell Santner, 9 Tim Southee, 10 Lockie Ferguson/Matt Henry, 11 Trent Boult
Andile Phehlukwayo sat out the previous match with a tight groin - his changes of pace were missed - but is fit and could rotate with one of the other allrounders. South Africa would have liked a chance to rest Kagiso Rabada, but with the series on the line may find it difficult. After backing from de Villiers, it appears unlikely JP Duminy or David Miller will be replaced by Farhaan Behardien.
South Africa (probable) 1 Hashim Amla, 2 Quinton de Kock (wk), 3 Faf du Plessis, 4 AB de Villiers (capt), 5 JP Duminy, 6 David Miller, 7 Dwaine Pretorius, 8 Wayne Parnell, 9 Andile Phehlukwayo, 10 Kagiso Rabada, 11 Imran Tahir
Pitch and conditions
This could be the truest wicket of a series where the pitches have provided unexpected assistance, especially for the spinners. De Villiers said that Imran Tahir, who took 5 for 24 in the T20I here, would enjoy the extra pace in the wicket. There is the chance of late showers. Rain in an Eden Park match between these two. Where have we seen that before?
Stats and trivia
  • New Zealand have won just two of their nine one-day series against South Africa: 2004 at home and 2013 away.
  • In 73 ODIs at Eden Park, New Zealand's record is level-pegging: 34 wins and 34 losses (with two ties and three no results)
  • AB de Villiers averages 203 against New Zealand on their home soil. He has only been dismissed three times in 11 innings. The most runs by a visiting batsman to New Zealand in a series of up to five matches is Rahul Dravid's 309 in 1998-99 - De Villiers is on 239.
Quotes
"Really looking forward to it, it's a nice challenge for us as team. Don't think this series has seen the best cricket we capable of, so tomorrow is a little opportunity to play in big pressure game."
Faf du Plessis
"I don't think either side has played the perfect game. There have been patches of brilliance but not a complete performance."
Tim Southee

Can assure you won't see a performance like that again: Kohli

Virat Kohli, the Indian captain, on Friday (March 3) said that the 333-run loss in the first Test of the four-match series provided India with an opportunity to understand where they were lacking and what areas the team needed to work on. When asked on the combination that India were going to play in the second Test in Bangalore, the skipper didn't commit to any on the eve of the match. All that and more from the press conference in Bangalore.
Excerpts:
Importance of restricting Steve Smith
Our focus is not only him. I think the whole team has to play well against Australia to win a Test match. That is something that we have identified. We are not focusing on one player at all. As I said last time, if we don't grab on to our chances, it doesn't matter how many runs someone ends up scoring. Basically, what was in our control, we did not execute that. So we are not focusing on one player only. The whole ten wickets have to be taken twice to win a Test match and that's something that we already know.
Do you think losses like Galle, Pune galvanise the team better?
I think it's an opportunity to understand what other things we still need to work on. We are all professional cricketers, but sometimes when you are winning a lot of games, you don't tend to focus on points that need to be improved as such because someone or the other is stepping up. When the whole team does not execute the things that you want to, you understand the things that you need to work on as a team. That's always a good sign. We got to know a lot more things that we need to still keep working on to be the top side in the world. As I said last time, you can't take anything for granted at any stage of a Test match. It's something that you look as an opportunity to learn rather than a setback. I think these things are also important for your cricket journey.
Is everyone available for selection?
Hardik Pandya is not available for selection. He has a niggle in his shoulder. So yeah, he's not fit to be available for selection. Rest of them are. Combinations, I won't let it out right now but we do have two or three combinations that we are looking at. We'll see what works best for this surface.
How's the morale of the side?
Sometimes such losses are necessary for the team. We have to test a lot of things. We look at it as a chance to improve some of the things that we need to win a Test match. We already know but sometimes you can't do it all. Very rarely does it happen that the full team doesn't contribute, it was one such Test for us. We got to learn a lot from the Test and our intention remains the same that we try and win. I think that's one thing that we have done consistently, it becomes very important to practice consistently to perform consistently. When we win, we have to practice with intensity and even when we lose we have to practice with the same intensity. Basically, seeing the result you can't change the way you practice.
Steve Smith suggests you will be under pressure...
Me? Does it look like? I'm pretty relaxed, I'm happy, I'm smiling. It's fine. It's his view, whatever he wants to say.
Thoughts on having to face Starc on this pitch?
I don't think there is going to be any extra variation added to his bowling suddenly. He is the bowler he is. We've got to accept that and we've got to face him the best way possible that we can as batsmen. That's all we look at. We're not looking too much into it. I think it's time to focus on our skills rather than what Australia is saying or preparing like. I know these mind-games, and these press conferences are something they're very good at. We're still going to play the cricket that we played in the last two years and see where the series ends in the fourth game.
Disappointed that after winning so many Tests and after one defeat people start criticising you?
I felt this sort of strange energy that some people were quite excited about the fact that they had something to write about the team after two years. Yeah, the pitch came into contention and the players' mindset and skills and pressure and whatnot, everything came into contention. It's fine, some people would have made more out of their jobs in those few days, I guess. Us as a team, we never got excited by praise, we don't focus on criticism either. What we focus on is what we think of each other as individuals in the change room and the respect that we maintain there. We take losses together, we take wins together and that's how we move forward as a team. That's one reason that we ended up having that streak, which we didn't expect honestly. It became a streak eventually. Our focus was to win games, every game that we play. And the focus remains the same, it doesn't matter whether we lose or we win, it's the way we play. Last game was a disappointment in the way we played, it wasn't more about the result - we've lost before, but we've lost fighting hard. But when you don't have enough intent during the game, that's when it hurts you. I think that's all that we made of it. The comments or headlines don't matter to us, they never have and we don't base our cricket on that.
You lost from a winning position in Galle. How inspiring is that example?
You look at the situation differently. It's similar to when you go into bat or bowl. You try to break a partnership by taking three wickets in a spell. You perceive the situation differently than other guys in the field and that's where you can make a difference. Similarly with batting, a situation might look difficult but if you believe that you can win from there, things start happening. We have more belief and more experience in the team right now than we did back then (Galle). I can assure you that everyone's taking this as a massive challenge. Everyone's raring to turn things around in the series and play the kind of cricket we know we can play, not take a backward step at any stage.
Long time since India lost. Have the players been sharper in training?
We don't necessarily push people to practise in different ways because every individual has his own way of preparing for the game. But in terms of mindset we have made a conscious push to go out there and express ourselves without thinking what if. Individuals want to play their natural game they should; they want to bowl a certain way and they should, not thinking about the outcome necessarily. There won't be any hesitation from here on till the end of the series from our side. That's something we've addressed. Practice has always been similar, win or lose. That's how you become consistent as a team, when you repeat the same things day in and day out. We have a set pattern of practise we always execute before every Test match and this time is no different. When you lose because of lack of intent, those things need to be addressed and we've done that.
Jayant Yadav to be replaced by Kuldeep? And Ishant to be replaced by Bhuvi?
These are perceptions. We have our ideas; we will go in with the best combination possible. Jayant has been outstanding. You can't put too much pressure on a guy who's played just one series. He's been brilliant so far; the way he's grabbed his spot has been outstanding. He's a very intelligent cricketer. All of us go through the grind. We have good games, bad games, off days as well. Pune wasn't his best game. I won't sit here and judge him because he's played only a few games but he knows how to turn things around and get back into that mindset he started his first series with. I'm sure he'll get back into that zone. As far as the combinations are concerned, we are studying a lot of options. Eventually we'll come to a conclusion thisevening...on what is the XI we want to go with. But yes, all kinds of possibilities tomorrow...might be a few surprises.
When do you decide?
We have a combination that we think of. And then we take a couple of days to convince ourselves. Finally if everyone's on the same page then you go ahead with the combination. More often than not, that ends up being the case. We all agree on the same XI. We're almost there. We will be there in a couple of hours.
Nature of the wicket?
I've played a lot of games here; I don't think the wicket has changed over the years at all. It looks like a typical Bangalore wicket. There's no surprises about the wicket. Whenever we've played Test cricket here we've done really well. We take all those things into account and we always play well at this stadium. The last time we played here against Australia, we won. Those things are big positives for us. We know exactly how the wicket plays. We know exactly what to do.
Combination - five bowlers?
We're studying a lot of options. I can't say whether five bowlers will play or four will play or how many batsmen will play. That should be left up to the team management to decide. I don't want to say something here only for us to end up playing someone else. Then you guys will rip me apart in the next PC. Why give you the pleasure?
Raat gayi, baat gayi. Importance offorgetting the pas and moving on?
It's very important, sir. Obviously you will want to forget a bad result but it's important that you take it to heart. It's important that you learn from it. If you ignore it then you can't improve. It's important to accept that we lost the Test match because of a lack of intent and because the other team played better cricket than us. If your ego is hurt and you ignore it then that thing piles on. We know we didn't play well and Australia did; that doesn't mean that will happen in every Test match. If you play well every day, every session, then you will win the Test match. We didn't do that. You will not get to see a performance like that again; that I can assure you

Wednesday, 1 March 2017

A new study says young Americans have a broad definition of news

Younger Americans have a broad definition of news that expands beyond the output of traditional news organizations and includes information gleaned from social media and user-generated content, according to a report out Wednesday from the Data & Society Research Institute.

“I think you have to really just listen to everything, and then pick out what you believe and what you think is really truthful,” said a 22-year-old African-American female who participated in the survey.

The report is based on focus groups with 52 people in their teens and 20s that were conducted last summer in Chicago, Charlotte, and Philadelphia. (Disclosure: The report was funded by the Knight Foundation, which also supports Nieman Lab.) Here are some of the report’s main takeaways:

Young people are accessing news in more ways than ever
A Pew study released last year found that 44 percent of Americans access news on Facebook. These focus groups found that younger news consumers tend to stumble upon news by accident or when they are utilizing various social platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, or Snapchat.
“[I was] not purposefully looking for it. Like Facebook, you get a notification for Facebook or something and you click on it and you start scrolling,” a 16-year-old white female told the researchers. “You’re going to find a bunch of news articles that you didn’t necessarily go there to see, but you’re going to see them and you’re going to click on them…I wouldn’t know a lot of the news if I didn’t go on Facebook and just look through it. Like the Orlando shootings — that’s how I found out about it, through Facebook.”
“If I don’t see it on social media, I’m not going to hear it,” a 17-year-old African-American said.
However, many of the participants said they were reluctant to share news and their thoughts on the news on social platforms publicly. Instead, many said that they will send links or screenshots to friends in messaging apps or other more private channels:
Many young people remove content from its original platform and share it through other means and channels. Some described cutting and pasting a link into a text message or screen shotting stories to send to friends through a third-party messaging app. Screen shotting was preferred by some to sending links because it provides a quick overview of the story while eliminating the need to click through advertisements.

Young adults say they don’t trust the media

The study says “the most striking point of consensus across the groups was their shared lack of trust in the news media.”
“Even if it’s factual, it may be sort of tainted,” a 23-year-old Hispanic and African-American female said.
Still, the participants said they tend to trust specific outlets and will often check multiple sources of information for stories they’re following. Some also said they were concerned about the algorithms that control Facebook’s News Feed.
“The problem with Facebook is if it constantly just shows you the stuff you want to see, it can create like a echo chamber, and you can really become very entrenched in your own opinion, and you won’t be able to understand people who have different views,” a 16-year-old white male said.
But with most young people using their mobile devices to consume information, the way stories are rendered on phones can also have an impact on trust levels, the study found:
Ads that are not overly intrusive, navigability on mobile phones, quick load times and having the latest details of a story are all critical factors for establishing trust that were mentioned in our groups and have been highlighted in other recent research. Trust in a news source often implies an emotional connection and a relationship of convenience.

Live video and user-generated content are seen as trustworthy

The participants said that they tend to trust videos from protesters or participants more than coverage from traditional news media.
“I’ll believe your [citizen-captured] video before I’ll believe theirs,” a 17-year-old African American said. “Because they will tamper with theirs. Why would you tamper with yours? They tamper with theirs to get more views for it so more people will watch their channel to see the news. You don’t have to do that. You just add a video. Why would you tamper with it?”
The focus groups were conducted last summer around the time of the deaths of Alton Sterling in Louisiana and Philando Castile in Minnesota at the hands of police officers, where videos taken by bystanders differed from the official narrative put forward by the authorities.
“In situations where there is a dispute over how events played out, video is seen as a powerful (if imperfect) way to challenge mainstream media coverage of controversial news events,” the report says.